- Albert Read (executive) (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/magazines-will-be-around-for-many-years-yet-the-world-needs-editing-9hsvhcbzd
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2019/05/05/albert-read-uk-boss-conde-nast-dont-think-magazines-doomed/ CondeNastBritain (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Please complete the following sentence: I believe the AfD was closed incorrectly because _______, and want to see _______ happen instead. See WP:DRVPURPOSE. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse the AfD obviously, there was nothing wrong with the closure or consensus, and no attempt was done to contact the admin (while admittedly is irregular on Wikipedia, but still). I am actually shocked RoySmith didn't close this already as it fails WP:DRVPURPOSE completely. My advice: create the new article, no ban/salt on the subject has happened and the AfD happened in mid-2018 (and the new sources you posted would surely prevent any G4). On the other side, there are also WP:COI issues here per the username (Albert Read is the executive of Conde Nast UK). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse - bad faith nomination. Nominator blocked for commercial editing and username violation. MER-C 21:06, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
|
